01
Detect
Correlate the request and supporting telemetry.
Interactive security proposal
Put a value on a faster response.
Model how company scale and remediation time affect operational exposure during a serious application-security incident.
Planning summary
Mid-market scenario
Employees
500
Response
72h
Incidents
2/yr
This is an illustrative planning model, not a prediction or guarantee of breach cost or savings.
Your operating profile
Build your response scenario
Adjust the assumptions to reflect the size and urgency of your organisation.
The number of employees potentially affected by service disruption and incident response.
1 person2,500
Used to estimate the hourly value flowing through business-critical services.
€100k€500m
The share of operations that depends on customer-facing applications and connected systems.
SupportingBusiness-critical
From the first signal to a patch your engineering team can evaluate.
4 hours7 days
From a confirmed signal to correlated evidence, source mapping and a reviewable patch proposal. Deployment remains subject to validation and human approval.
5 minutes24 hours
Your estimate for external security support, emergency engineering, restoration and professional advice for one material incident.
€500€250k
Incidents serious enough to require investigation and engineering remediation.
16
Why response time matters
Every handoff extends the exposure window.
The goal is not uncontrolled automatic patching. It is getting engineers to a well-supported decision sooner, with the evidence, affected code and proposed remediation in one place.
Current response window72 hours
DetectTriageFind sourcePatch ready
AegisLens patch proposal target5 minutes
72 modeled hours returned to containment, review and recovery
02
Confirm
Separate suspicious input from a confirmed unsafe flow.
03
Prepare
Generate a constrained patch with the evidence attached.
04
Review
Keep the final engineering decision with your team.
The business case
Reduce delay without removing control.
Less investigation drag
Bring the attack evidence, related events and source mapping into one investigation rather than several disconnected tools.
72h
modeled response time reclaimed
A shorter engineering handoff
Give developers the affected component, unsafe flow and proposed patch instead of a generic vulnerability alert.
100%
shorter modeled review window
Governed remediation
Keep code changes reviewable and operational actions behind explicit human approval and an audit trail.
100%
human review for consequential actions
Proposed operating model
Start with evidence. End with an accountable decision.
AegisLens is designed to complement the security and development systems a company already uses, not replace every control around them.
ObserveApplication, authentication and host telemetry
InvestigateEvidence correlation and source-level context
RemediateReviewable code proposal or operational recommendation
GovernHuman approval and an explicit audit history
Continue the proposal
See what the 5 minutes patch proposal target looks like in the product.
Follow a detected SQL injection from payload evidence to source confirmation and a reviewable remediation proposal.
Model assumptions: annual revenue is distributed across 8,760 hours; workforce exposure uses a loaded cost of €58 per employee hour; 35% of dependent workforce cost and 35% of the shortened exposure window are included. The model also includes up to 25% of the response and recovery estimate, scaled by the improvement in response time. Enter your own cost estimate; the default is not an industry average. Actual incident impact varies by industry, architecture, controls and attack severity.